Honestly, looking at the development of the entire public chain track over this period, I am somewhat tired of it.

Everyone is frantically showing off TPS data or still talking about the dazzling "full decentralization" story. But after being in this circle for a long time, you’ll realize a harsh reality: what really blocks Mass Adoption is not how fast the chain is, but how "smooth" the entire business process is.

What does this "smooth" refer to? It’s about those hidden costs beneath the surface—how to pass compliance checks? How to calculate carbon emissions? How to make traditional business giants feel at ease and willing to jump in? These are the real bottlenecks that can threaten lives.

**Not aiming to be the "Ethereum Killer," but rather a "Web2 Conduit"**

When I look at the ideas of some emerging public chains, what impresses me most is how cleverly they bypass the overused "EVM compatibility" standard, instead targeting the vertical tracks of "entertainment" and "branding."

Looking at it from another perspective, if I were a Web2 game developer or luxury brand with millions of users, and I wanted to enter Web3, what would I fear the most?

I’m not worried about the chain being too trendy or "Web3" enough; I fear that users will leave because of a one or two cent interaction cost. I’m even more worried about my financial reports being tarnished by high energy consumption on the blockchain, affecting ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings.

This is the real-world business calculation. The design logic of some new public chains clearly targets these "psychological barriers," trying to find ways to cut down those heavy burdens...